The Surprises of Victorian Spirituality

The Victorian era lives in our imaginations as a time of spiritual repression. But it was also a time of surprising developments, many of which were vital to shaping thought on religion and spirituality in the 20th century. Victorian spirituality continues to influence our worldviews today in ways that we might not readily realize.

Although Victorian England was ruled by strict and all-encompassing social-moral codes to a much greater extent than today’s society, it was also an incubator for very familiar conflicts. Questions of following authority versus following your own heart, of tradition versus rationality, of age-old versus modern ideas of virtue can all be found in spades in the spirituality and religion of the Victorian era.

The history of these questions is older than the Victorian era. In fact, it’s probably as old as history itself–some believe that the very founding of Christianity reflects just such a conflict between the traditional law of the Old Testament and the more modern virtues of love and forgiveness. But origin of Christianity aside, there are some more recent important events to discuss in order to understand Victorian spirituality. The eighteenth century birthed both evangelical Christianity and secular-rationalism as we know them today.

In the year 1720, the First Great Awakening (18th century religious revival pic at left in the public domain under PD-1923) kicked off the first in a series of evangelical Christian revivals that are still going on today. This revival of religious fervor focused both on the importance of a personal relationship with God, and the importance of following Biblical law–each was seen to both require and cause the other. If you truly had a personal relationship with God, you would feel compelled to follow Biblical law and the reason behind the law would be obvious to you. If you followed Biblical law, this would create and strengthen a personal relationship with God.

We still see this attitude in evangelical Christian circles today; if one does not follow Biblical law as interpreted by authority, their relationship with God and therefore their motives and overall moral fiber are suspect. If one does follow Biblical law, on the other hand, one is assumed to have a rich and rewarding personal relationship with God.

So in the end, the First Great Awakening did two things: it revived genuine spiritual experience and passion in a world where, up to that point, religious devotion had largely cooled to the point where religion was “just something that everybody did.” But the form that passion took, as it became a passion for Biblical law, was in fact the source of decidedly un-spiritual social strictures like the Victorian “cult of femininity” where everything a woman did was seen through the lens of her fitness for the God-given tasks of keeping house and raising children.

Meanwhile, on the opposite end of the intellectual-spiritual spectrum, the Age of Enlightenment was bringing secular and scientific thought to levels of popularity and sophistication never before seen in Western European civilization. Spawning, among other things, the American Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights, the Age of Enlightenment encouraged morals derived from logic and reason, scientific exploration of the world, and an outright rejection of traditional morality.

Continuing the age-old war between science and religion, the Enlightenment spawned not only indifference to Biblical morality, but outright antagonism toward it; was Benjamin Franklin perhaps the quintessential Enlightenment man for his commitment to both secular-rational governance and scientific discovery. He was also a member of the Hellfire Club, a social club devoted to intellectual discussion, political advancement of logic and reason, and engaging in all manner of Biblical immorality.

It is in this setting that Victorian religion and spirituality developed: on one hand we have a spiritually fervent but morally restrictive Great Awakening of evangelical Christianity, on the other a secular-rational Enlightenment that rejects all trappings of religion.

At the beginning of the Victorian era, these were the two major influences: non-Christian spirituality was nowhere to be found on the scene in Victorian England. Spiritual innovation and non-Christian religious traditions were looked down upon by evangelical Christians and Enlightenment thinkers alike, for very different reasons. To the Christians, any spiritual experience or practice outside of Christianity was demonic; to students of the Enlightenment, it was superstitious, delusional and unnecessary.

But as the Victorian era progressed, a funny thing happened. With the deeply spiritual influence of the Great Awakening and the rational influence of the Enlightenment living side-by-side, new tradition-defying religions began to pop up. The 19th century saw the number of Christian denominations in existence skyrocket, as well as the birth of spiritualism, the Theosophical Society, and even the publication of “Aradia, or The Gospel of Witches.”

Spiritualism is, to me, the most intriguing of these movements, if only because it rose to prominence so quickly and is now largely extinct. This school of thought, born in America in the 1840s, has been characterized variously as a philosophy or a religion. It had its own very specific beliefs and practices, but lacked the all-encompassing theology and liturgy of most organized religions.

Spiritualists deeply believed in the afterlife and the divine. Their practices derived from what they believed to be their personal contact with spirits of the dead, who communicated from the realm of spirits through mediums and seances. Mediums were the propagators and the basic units of spiritualist practices; seances were held by hundreds of these men and women who were able to put on a convincing display of bridging the gap between the physical world of the living and the spiritual world of the dead.

Despite emphasizing the importance on man’s nature as a spiritual being and the literal reality of the supernatural, the spiritualist movement also had decidedly nontraditional sensibilities. For them, the Bible was not the ultimate source of spiritual truth: personal experience with the divine was, and the Bible wasn’t the gateway to making this happen. Likewise, most saw Heaven, Hell, and salvation through Christ were as morally untenable; they held to the Enlightenment-inspired moral sensibility that each person was responsible for his or her own actions.

Because of these moral sensibilities and the rejection of the Biblically-backed Victorian social hierarchy, spiritualism tended to draw social reformers. Spiritualists and their opponents alike saw spiritualism as being in opposition to such concepts as monarchy, a divinely ordained class system, and the God-given hierarchy of the sexes. Many prominent spiritualist writers and mediums were women; Coral Hatch (photograph of her at right is in the public domain under US PD-1923), was a prominent spiritualist speaker who fascinated audiences by being at once smart, articulate, and pretty. This was in blatant contradiction to prevailing Victorian view that women were not made by God to be intellectuals or public speakers.

Another manifestation of the liberal-yet-spiritual environment just beginning to take hold at the end of the Victorian era was the rise of the “New Age.” The term “New Age” originated in a Christian publication in the 1890s, which described the dawning of a “New Age of Christian brotherhood” to be characterized by love and understanding. The non-Christian spiritualities that we think of today when we think of “New Age” also began to emerge in the late 19th century, as spiritual movements that emphasized “union with” and “empowerment by” the divine without the need for Christian trappings like salvation by faith or redemption from Original Sin.

In his book The Varieties of Religious Experience (which is a fascinating, amazing, fantastic book that I recommend to everyone) published in 1901, legendary psychologist and philosopher William James discusses the rise of “positive thought religions.” He calls this “once-born” spirituality, saying that unlike born-again Christians, these followers of these schools of thought don’t feel that they started life inherently flawed and needed the “redemption” of Christ. Rather, the believers felt that a transformative and deeply personal connection with the divine was something always available to humans, if they would just reach out and grasp it.

Sound familiar? All of these Victorian movements profoundly influenced spirituality throughout the 20th century. Evangelical Christianity is still around, as is Enlightenment-style rejection of all religious trappings and supernatural beliefs in the guise of “New Atheism.” The mixing of modern moral sensibilities with revivalist passion for a personal experience of the divine helped open the door to non-Christian religions, birth the New Age movement, and ultimately give rise to the “personal religion” revolution of the 20th century.

I plan to blog more about this “personal religion” revolution later, as I find it both fascinating and socially important. In the meantime, we can only benefit from looking at our history–including the surprises of the Victorian era.

This entry was posted in Religion and Spirituality, The Victorian Era, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Surprises of Victorian Spirituality

  1. Sigrid says:

    Possibly interesting side note, just to add: some Neo-Pagans refer to the occultism and such that was active in the Victorian era as Meso-Paganism (with Paleo-Paganism referring to the original cultures that first worshiped various pantheons such as the Greek and Norse), since a lot of the ideas and philosophies that cropped up in those movements are traceable to currently active spiritual paths like Wicca, and some forms of Neo-Druidism.

    I’ve always found that kind of fascinating 😀

    • kagmi says:

      Cool, thanks for sharing that! That will help me with future searches on the subject. I know very little about pagan practice during this time–before and after, yes, but not during the Victorian era. I don’t know if that’s because it wasn’t around that much, or if I just haven’t read the right sources.

      There are a few things I really wanted to talk about more here that I might do at some point. When I referred to occultism, I was actually talking about the Theosophical Society, which I don’t think counts as pagan but which is weird and fascinating and historically relevant. I also wanted to talk a little more about the source of Aradia and the controversy around it, but I ran out of room. Maybe in a future post…

  2. Vinay says:

    Like the subject and your efforts too……………but I suggest you go through all the corners of Indian Spiritualism and then reach out to other parts of world and its all era. Fact remains that when entire West was in the peaks of Barbarism………………India was Enjoying Pinnacle of Spirituality. Victorian Era came as Big Blow to India as India was Enslaved by British, who once got surer of their position in India, developed a sense of mission, there grew up contempt for Indian culture. This was partly due to cultural arrogance on the part of the British, who dismissed Indian literature as pagan rubbish and Indian science as primitive nonsense. Macauly disposed of ‘the whole native literature of India’ as ‘medical doctrines which would disgrace an English farrier – Astronomy, which would move laughter in girls at an English boarding school – History, abounding with kings thirty feet high, and reigns thirty thousand years long – and Geography, made up of seas of treacle and seas of butter’. Such an attitude tended to discredit Indian culture in the eyes of Victorian England, and to give eccentric and non-conformist overtones to any interest in it. There are very few references to India, let alone Indian influences, in English creative literature, although in the twentieth century a growing interest in Eastern philosophy – which had begun in the 1890s – influenced the works of such poets as W.B.Yeats and ‘AE’. Towards the end of his life, the latter, in collaboration with an Indian, produced a version of the Upnishads. (1937).

    Fortunately, the attitude of McCauley and others did not affect scholarly research, which, since it satisfied the Victorian criterion of scientific curiosity, was not regarded as eccentric in its Indian manifestation. In 1870, there began in France the publication of the Bibliotheque Orientale. Four years later, in England, came the great series of sacred books of the East, under the editorship of Friedrich Max-Muller (1823-1900). Between them, these two series were to make the Hindu scriptures available for the first time to the general reader. In 1875, James Fergusson published his History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, the first important work on the subject.



  3. Vinay says:

    From the very earliest times, India has made its contribution to the texture of Western thought and living. Throughout the literature of Europe, tales of Indian origin can be discovered. European mathematics – and through them, the full range of European technical achievement – could hardly have existed without Indian numerals. But until the beginning of European colonization in Asia, India’s contribution was usually filtered through other cultures. Direct contact did not bring understanding, travelers’ tales, rather, increased the sense of wonder. Even commerce helped to feed the imagination, for its trading cargoes – of bezoars stones, musk, silk and pearls – were luxuries, exotic and non-European. The ‘gorgeous East’ became an essential part of the western view of India, influencing the ideas of merchants as well as of poets.

    In the second part of the eighteenth century, works of travel, memoirs and histories increased enormously in number, and from them Europe began to assemble an image of India less concerned with physical wonders than with ideas. The philosophers, always on the lookout for some ideal civilization, first thought they had found it in China, and then began to consider India a more likely place. By 1775, Voltaire was convinced that Western astronomy and astrology had come from somewhere along the river Ganges. The French astronomer, Bailly, who was guillotined during the French Revolution, maintained that the Brahmins of India had been tutors of the Greeks and, through them, of Europe. Towards the end of the eighteenth century, there was a general feeling amongst European intellectuals that Indian civilization was of great antiquity – but it was only a feeling, for they did not have access to Indian literature. Very little was known about it, and no translations from Sanskrit, the literary language, had appeared.

    The first adaptation of a Sanskrit work into a Western language had appeared as early as 1651; this was of a collection of lyrics by the poet Bhartrihari, who died AD 651. The adaptation was, in fact, a paraphrase in Dutch prose of a version in Portuguese. The existence of Sanskrit had been known for some time in the West, but as it was a sacred and liturgical language used only by the priestly caste for ritual observances, it was difficult to find a Brahmin willing to teach it to a European. Jesuit missionaries had acquired some knowledge of the language, and it was a work compiled by them – L’Ezour Vedam, a highly inaccurate version of the Yajur Veda-which was to influence Voltaire. In 1762, a young Frenchman, Anquetil Duperron, who had discovered a manuscript in a Paris shop and had gone out to India as a soldier in the service of the French East India Company in order to learn how to decipher it – returned to Paris with a number of manuscripts, one of which was a Persian version of sixty sections of the ancient Hindu work, the Upnishads. This he published in 1801-02 in a peculiar mixture of Persian, Latin and Greek. Duperron’s work known as the Oupnekhat, so affected the German philosopher, Schopenhauer that he later claimed: ‘It has been the solace of my life, it will be the solace of my death.’

    The real revelation of Sanskrit literature, however, was to come as a byproduct of the establishment of direct British rule in Bengal. Warren Hastings encouraged the study of Sanskrit for a purely practical purpose-to ascertains the nature of Hindu law. A number of digests were first prepared, but these were found to be inadequate and it proved necessary to go to the original sources. Nevertheless, the first published translation from the Sanskrit was not of a law book, but of the great philosophical poem, the Bhagwat Gita. This appeared in 1785 and was the work of Charles Wilkins (1749-1836). In his preface Wilkins noted that the work was only imperfectly understood even by the most learned Brahmins of the time. It was even less likely to be understood by the Europeans, and its publication had no immediate impact.

    William Jones’s translation of the play Sakuntala, by the dramatist Kalidasa (AD 400) was a very different matter. Jones who had been appointed a judge at Calcutta in 1783, helped to found the Asiatic Society of Bengal in the following year. He first translated Sakuntala into Latin, maintaining that it was the only European language, which had any resemblance to Sanskrit. He then translated, the Latin version into English, and it was this, first published in 1789, which was later translated into other European languages. To his translation, Jones added no notes and only a very short preface, assuming perhaps that his English readers would already be sufficiently acquainted with Hindu mythology and Indian life through the publications of the Asiatic society.

    Some of them undoubtedly were, and there are traces of Indian ideas in the works of Shelley and Wordsworth, among others. But the real effect of Jones’s work and of other translations from Sanskrit was to appear in the poets and writers of early nineteenth century Germany.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s